1-2-3-4 Project* after the Aurora, CO, shootings

Sample letters:

* Letters to the president (1),

to the state governors (2),

to the U.S. representatives (3),

 and to the U.S. senators (4).

~ ~ ~

1ST LASTsuffix

email

home address

city, state zip

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Dear President Obama:

I would like you to propose some meaningful gun control legislation, to include limiting the size of clips and quantities of ammunition, as some of the common sense steps in making America safer after the shootings in Aurora, CO, July 20, 2012.

Also, if you could take initiatives to make our mental health services more pro-active to identify and treat at risk persons, I think that would help make America safer.

Additionally, I want to urge you to support the creation of a federal level Department of Peace and Non-Violence. I believe our cultural belief in the myth of redemptive violence is what fuels the unending violence on our streets, in public places, and in our homes. To counter this, I believe, there needs to be a high level priority in all our institutions of self-government to advance the values of non-violence and peacemaking and I hope you agree.

Sincerely,

1ST LASTsuffix

email

home address

city, state zip

KC Move To Amend

KC Move To Amend

Occupy the Federal Court
in Kansas City!

Friday, January 20

11:30am - 1:30pm

Federal Courthouse

400 East 9th Street MAP

Kansas City MO

Inspired by our friends at Occupy Wall Street, Move To Amend is planning bold action to mark the second anniversary of the infamous Citizens United v. FEC decision!

Occupy the Courts will be a one day occupation of Federal courthouses across the country, including the U.S. Supreme Courtin Washington, D.C., on Friday January 20, 2012.

Move to Amend volunteers across the USA will lead the charge on the judiciary which created — and continues to expand — corporate personhood rights.

Americans across the country are on the march, and they are marching OUR way. They carry signs that say, “Corporations are NOT people! Money is NOT Speech!”
And they are chanting those truths at the top of their lungs!
The time has come to make these truths evident to the courts.

Repeal the Death Penalty in Kansas -- final vote in Senate, 2010

1094 JOURNAL OF THE SENATE (2/19/2010)

SB 375, An act concerning abolition of the death penalty; amending K.S.A. 21-3452, 21-4622, 21-4634, 21-4635, 21-4641, 21-4706, 22-3405, 22-3705, 22-3728 and 22-4210 and K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 21-4619, 21-4642, 22-3717, 22-4902, 38-2255, 38-2271, 38-2312, 38- 2365, 39-970, 65-5117, 72-1397 and 75-52,148 and repealing the existing sections; also repealing K.S.A. 21-3439, 21-4623, 21-4624, 21-4625, 21-4626, 21-4627, 21-4629, 21-4630 and 21-4631.

On roll call, the vote was: Yeas 20, Nays 20, Present and Passing 0, Absent or Not Voting 0.

Yeas: Brungardt, Emler, Faust-Goudeau, Francisco, Haley, Hensley, Kelly, Kultala, Lee, McGinn, Morris, Owens, Pilcher-Cook, Reitz, Schmidt V, Steineger, Taddiken, Teichman, Umbarger, Vratil.

Nays: Abrams, Apple, Barnett, Brownlee, Bruce, Colyer, Donovan, Holland, Huelskamp, Huntington, Kelsey, Lynn, Marshall, Masterson, Ostmeyer, Petersen, Pyle, Schmidt D, Schodorf, Wagle.

A constitutional majority having failed to vote in favor of the bill, SB 375 did not pass.

EXPLANATION OF VOTE

MR. PRESIDENT: I vote no on SB 375 which would abolish the Kansas death penalty. Under threat of the Kansas death penalty, the killer of Kelsey Smith plead guilty and spared her family the agony of a trial or they may still be awaiting that trial. I believe human life is created by God and therefore of immeasurable value. Yes I can say I am prolife and vote to protect unborn life which is totally innocent and not had the opportunity to wrong anyone. Yet I also believe that it is just punishment to allow the death penalty in limited cases when someone has unjustly and violently taken another’s life.— KARIN BROWNLEE

Senator Lynn requests the record to show she concurs with the ‘‘Explanation of Vote’’ offered by Senator Brownlee.

MR. PRESIDENT: The people of my Senate district elected me to represent their views on the great issues of the day. It is an honor and a privilege to be elected to represent them. I have lived with, listened to, and discussed many issues with my constituents. This is one of the fundamental issues where I must represent their views. And while there are many issues pro and con, the people of my Senate district have made it clear that they support the death penalty for the most heinous of crimes.—JEFF COLYER

Senator Ostmeyer requests the record to show he concurs with the ‘‘Explanation of Vote’’ offered by Senator Colyer on SB 375.

MR. PRESIDENT: I vote ‘‘AYE’’ on SB 375. The record kept by my secretary shows that every one of my constituents who contacted me on this issue asked me to support the bill. The concerns they raised varied widely: the terrible possibility of executing an innocent person, prolonging the suffering of a victim’s family, the need to maintain respect for human dignity, the ineffectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent or way to get a plea bargain, the estimated 70% greater cost of a case taken to execution vs. lifetime incarceration, and the requirement that the death penalty should reflect the ‘‘conscience of the community’’ which may not be possible if a significant percentage of potential jurors are not permitted to serve on a capital case because they oppose the death penalty. I appreciate the Senate Judiciary Committee working out the details and moving this bill forward, the Majority Leader scheduling the debate, and the committee chair carrying the bill. It made it possible for me to express the wishes of my constituents to live in a state that does not allow for the death penalty, no matter how limited. — MARCI FRANCISCO.

Senator Hensley requests the record to show he concurs with the ‘‘Explanation of Vote’’ offered by Senator Francisco on SB 375.

MR PRESIDENT: In time.....Over the course of Time will always come reflection and that reflection will bring Abiding Confirmation or Deep Regret. May God have mercy on the souls of these ‘‘justice’’ seeking Americans today. And always. In this Time and in this hallowed Place, with God’s abiding Grace . . . we almost made a real Difference. — DAVID HALEY

MR. PRESIDENT: The death penalty has been on and off Kansas statutes since the late 1800’s. Although placed back on the books in 1994, no one has been executed since 1965. The death penalty has not been applied equitably across the state. The issue of justice is mirrored in two ways, some seeing justice when a murderer is executed, others when he is locked up without any amenities and with time to think about the horrible crime he committed. Many family members of murder victims who are against the death penalty would prefer life without parole. Having a death penalty was low on the list of priorities of the National Poll of Police Chiefs for preventing crimes. Dollars spent would be better used to prevent future heinous crimes, preventing the wrong people from walking the streets. Dollars could be spent on law enforcement, corrections, parole, drug and alcohol programs, or invested in pre-and post-natal programs. This is a very emotional and controversial issue; people on both sides feel strongly. Although we may have like to avoid the discussion, as a legislature we have the responsibility to deal with issues and allow our constituents who want repeal of the death penalty the opportunity to make their case. — CAROLYN MCGINN.

Senators Faust-Goudeau, Kelly, Kultala, Morris, Owens, Umbarger and Vratil request the record to show they concur with the ‘‘Explanation of Vote’’ offered by on SB 375.

MR. PRESIDENT: I vote NO on SB 375. The people who elected me to represent them in the 40th Senate District expect me to vote their views. It is an honor to have been elected by them, and I take that privilege very seriously. Although this is a very deeply felt issue on my part, I hold my Catholic faith very dear, my constituents have always trusted my judgment. Without giving them an opportunity to respond with such short notice on this issue, I feel I can explain the no vote. The majority of my constituents prior to today’s debate, have made it clear they support the death penalty for the most heinous of crimes. — RALPH OSTMEYER

MR. PRESIDENT: I have thought many years about the efficacy and effectiveness of the death penalty. For many years I have believed that the death penalty has no deterrent effect what so ever. I also believe there is clear and compelling evidence that innocent men have been put to death. I have defended the death penalty as a tool for prosecutors to use to gain cooperation from those accused of crime. However, the advocacy for the repeal of the death penalty by Therese Bangert, John Vratil, Carolyn McGinn, David Haley, and others have convinced me to move on from those outdated positions. I enjoy freedom . . . to be outdoors, to travel, to be with my family and friends. For me, the more cruel punishment is life in prison, alive but without freedom. It is true that we Americans, by keeping the death penalty, remain in league with nations, such as Iran, Yemen, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia. I prefer to join the nations who have attained universal health care for their citizens, established comprehensive early childhood education, resisted the economic burden of the military-industrial complex, and ended the death sentence. — CHRIS STEINEGER